On Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 05:27:20AM +0100, Marcus Comstedt wrote:

 > So, what do you think?  We'd have to come up with a better name than
 > "mmf" though.  :-)  And it shouldn't be "mmf0", "mmf1" etc, it should
 > really be mmfa2 for port A subunit 2 etc, as that's how you'd want the
 > device nodes named.  (Is it possible?)

It all seems reasonable.

But, there isn't much of a way to assign units as you describe, without
some additional layer of indirection.

-- 
        -- Jason R. Thorpe <thorpej@zembu.com>