Subject: Re: Are tlp[01] weak for big traffic?
To: Vadim P. <vadim@realconnect.com>
From: NAKAJI Hiroyuki <nakaji@jp.freebsd.org>
List: port-cobalt
Date: 12/08/2006 17:52:26
>>>>> In <457924C4.9070103@realconnect.com> 
>>>>>	"Vadim P." <vadim@realconnect.com> wrote:

> Reason #1 should be brushed away. This box is not that slow. Just keep
> an eye on the processes and the memory usage during transfers. Any
> unusual CPU% or memory consumption surges should raise a flag.

Which commands are useful for this kind of monitoring? systat, vmstat or
else?

> Reason #2 must be tested and this is easy to do: just bypass the hub
> by connecting your PC directly to tlp1 with a cross-over cable.

Now I have to buy a cross-over cable. :)

> Then you will be down to #3 and on.

> Hope this helps.

Thank you. I'll check the performance.

> NAKAJI Hiroyuki wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm using COBALT Cache RaQ 2 with 256MB RAM running NetBSD/cobalt 4.99.4
> > as a NAT router in my room. The outline of my use is like this:
> >
> >    -----------+----------- main stream (connected to the Internet)
> >               |tlp0        OCN registered /29 network
> >             +-+-+  \
> >             |RaQ|  NAT
> >             +-+-+  /
> >               |tlp1
> >      ---+-----+----------- private subnet (testing network, 192.168.1.0/24)
> >       +-+-+
> >       |P C|
> >       +-+-+
> >
> > Here, when I download large files such as iso images of NetBSD or Solaris
> > Express on PC, the traffice rate at tlp0 and tlp1 decreases and finnally
> > it becomes zero. And the PC gets offline.
> >
> > My assumption is following. What is the possibility?
> >
> > 1. RaQ 2 is too slow to handle large traffic.
> > 2. The HUB I'm using on private subnet is too weak.
> > 3. tlp(4) has some problem.
> > 4. other
> >
> > If 3 is the true reason, what shoud I do to debug or improve it? Do I have
> > to show more information about my RaQ2?
> >   



-- 
NAKAJI Hiroyuki