All servers are running one applications each, but in productions and 
have a good amount of load.

Some run qmail, others djbdns, some ftp, some web service, some many 
perl scripts, some mrtg, one nagio, I even have one running MySQL, but 
that took for ever to compile it, two days!

All of them are making it to 3.0, obviously, they are not all there yet 
for sure. Does take time to do so.

Are you sure your memory is good? It will panic with bad one.

But I will make sure to put some under a very good load and report back 
on the outcome.

One thing to be said, all my Cobalt are RaQ 2, however. I had issue with 
one before that only had 16 Mb and crash, but putting only 32Mb took 
care of it and is not running for well over a year none stop.



Alex Pelts wrote:
> I do not have PF or SCSI or RIDFrame. This is the last panic I got:
> 
> "panic: lockmgr: no context".
> 
> I am not even sure what was going on as it happened at night. It is 
> kindof annoying for the box to panic out of the blue. Don't get me 
> wrong, I am not complaining but IMHO 3.0 is not ready to be a release at 
> least on the qube.
> 
> What are you running on your qubes? I am running apache with php and ssh 
> . That is basically it. I also ftp sometimes in to the qube to upload 
> pictures and such and download backups. Under 2.1 ftp downloads caused 
> panic. Under 3.0 http server is causing panic. I am not so sure what the 
> "lockmgr" is.
> 
> The load of my server is very light. I have maybe 200 hits on a good 
> day. Mostly it is idle.
> 
> Regards,
> Alex
> 
> 
> Daniel Ouellet wrote:
> 
>> So far I can't say I have any issues.
>>
>> But again, on all my boxes and for years, I never do any upgrades.
>>
>> I always do a clean install and it takes care of any problems I have 
>> seen otherwise.
>>
>> In a few weeks, I can report more success or failures and I will have 
>> more then about 30 boxes of various ages running 3.0 with PF enable in 
>> kernel and without the RAIDFrame and SCSI stuff. So far every time I 
>> took that out, it resulted in increase stability.
>>
>> YMMV, but that's from my side and not only one one box, but many of them!
>>
>> Daniel
>>
>> Alex Pelts wrote:
>>
>>> I installed 3.0 from the working qube by unpacking, not from restore 
>>> cd. I have random crashes when http server is accessed by more than 1 
>>> client at the same time. Kernel is custom compiled to remove the 
>>> things that I don't use.
>>>
>>> I am thinking of going back to 1.6.2 which was a very stable version 
>>> at least for me. 2.1 was even less stable than 3.0 and I do not see 
>>> any benefits as far as performance goes. I will probably wait until 
>>> 3.0 matures to move my qube to it again.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Alex
>>>
>>>
>>> Claudio Leiva S wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi:
>>>>
>>>> Any issue installing 3.0 on a Qube 2, I have the process with the CD 
>>>> done but when it restart it get stuck on "Starting Up".
>>>>
>>>> Any ideas, the specs of my box are.
>>>>
>>>> 256 mb
>>>> 120 Gb hard drive
>>>>
>>>> Unfortunatelly I dont have a serial connection with the box..
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Claudio Leiva S.
>>>> Las Vegas, Nevada.
>>>> USA
>>>> http://cleiva.no-ip.org
>>>> (Powered by NetBSD for Cobalt)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Daniel Ouellet" 
>>>> <daniel@presscom.net>
>>>> To: <port-cobalt@netbsd.org>
>>>> Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 12:06 AM
>>>> Subject: Compile PF in kernel on Cobalt is no go on 3.0
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> I tried a few times to enable PF and so far, I can't even compile 
>>>>> the kernel with it enable.
>>>>>
>>>>> As far as I can see, only these needs to be commented out:
>>>>>
>>>>> pseudo-device   pf                      # PF packet filter
>>>>> pseudo-device   pflog                   # PF log if
>>>>>
>>>>> as by default it is not in the GENERIC kernel.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have no problem making any changes to the kernel and get it to 
>>>>> compile, but this two line to turn it up as far as I can see, 
>>>>> result in no go.
>>>>>
>>>>> I wish I had the error to put here, but as it takes a long time to 
>>>>> compile, I did it in the background and sing off, so, I didn't see 
>>>>> the errors the last time, but no matter what variation I do, still 
>>>>> no go.
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyone able to do so yet? Am I forgetting to do something else as 
>>>>> well.
>>>>>
>>>>> Also, in default there isn't a PF device in the /dev, so I use 
>>>>> makedev to create it, not sure that it is the proper way for this 
>>>>> one however.
>>>>>
>>>>> Any clue to offer?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>