Subject: Re: Restore CD 2.0-1 may still have issue for some install ***
To: Daniel Ouellet <daniel@presscom.net>
From: Pete Rushmere <pete@rushmere.org>
List: port-cobalt
Date: 03/10/2005 07:12:27
I agree, I did notice this on the console during the install.
I've taken SCSI support out of the running kernel altogether now....
Kind Regards,
Pete.
At 07:01 10/03/2005, you wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I would appreciate feedback on this install if any have actually done so.
>
>Testing more on this, looks like the distribution we have done for the 2.0
>may still have an issue with it.
>
>The default kernel have the RAIDframe enable in it by default
>
>See here:
>
>http://netbsd.ouellet.biz/iso/config-20.html
>
>More specifically here:
>
><snip>
># Disk/mass storage pseudo-devices
>#pseudo-device ccd 4 # concatenated disk devices
>#pseudo-device cgd 4 # cryptographic disk devices
> >>>pseudo-device raid 8 # RAIDframe disk driver
> >>>options RAID_AUTOCONFIG # auto-configuration of RAID
># Options to enable various other RAIDframe RAID types.
># options RF_INCLUDE_EVENODD=1
># options RF_INCLUDE_RAID5_RS=1
># options RF_INCLUDE_PARITYLOGGING=1
># options RF_INCLUDE_CHAINDECLUSTER=1
># options RF_INCLUDE_INTERDECLUSTER=1
># options RF_INCLUDE_PARITY_DECLUSTERING=1
># options RF_INCLUDE_PARITY_DECLUSTERING_DS=1
>#pseudo-device md 1 # memory disk device (ramdisk)
>#pseudo-device vnd 4 # disk-like interface to files
><snip>
>
>But in our distribution of the 1.6.2, we do not have it.
>
>http://netbsd.ouellet.biz/iso/config-162.html
>
>Look here:
>
><snip>
># Disk/mass storage pseudo-devices
>#pseudo-device ccd 4 # concatenated disk devices
>#pseudo-device raid 8 # RAIDframe disk driver
>#options RAID_AUTOCONFIG # auto-configuration of RAID
># Options to enable various other RAIDframe RAID types.
># options RF_INCLUDE_EVENODD=1
># options RF_INCLUDE_RAID5_RS=1
># options RF_INCLUDE_PARITYLOGGING=1
># options RF_INCLUDE_CHAINDECLUSTER=1
># options RF_INCLUDE_INTERDECLUSTER=1
># options RF_INCLUDE_PARITY_DECLUSTERING=1
># options RF_INCLUDE_PARITY_DECLUSTERING_DS=1
>#pseudo-device md 1 # memory disk device (ramdisk)
>pseudo-device vnd 4 # disk-like interface to files
><snip>
>
>With the result that for a new install, I get a few times this:
>
><snip>
>
> >>>>>Kernelized RAIDframe activated
>
>scsibus0: waiting 2 seconds for devices to settle...
>
>wd0 at atabus0 drive 0INTRF
>
>panic: siop_intr: I shouldn't be there !
>
>Stopped at 0x801b5808: jr ra
>
> bdslot: nop
>
>ddb>
>
>
>So, I am looking into this, but I would appreciate some feedback to make
>this better.
>
>I really don't think anyone will put RAIDframe on a Cobalt right?
>
>We do love it, but even this box have limits. (:>
>
>Let me know, but look like we will do a trim on the default kernel for the
>cobalt to make this reliable on each install.
>
>Daniel
>