Hi all,

I would appreciate feedback on this install if any have actually done so.

Testing more on this, looks like the distribution we have done for the 
2.0 may still have an issue with it.

The default kernel have the RAIDframe enable in it by default

See here:

http://netbsd.ouellet.biz/iso/config-20.html

More specifically here:

<snip>
# Disk/mass storage pseudo-devices
#pseudo-device	ccd		4	# concatenated disk devices
#pseudo-device	cgd		4	# cryptographic disk devices
 >>>pseudo-device	raid		8	# RAIDframe disk driver
 >>>options 	RAID_AUTOCONFIG		# auto-configuration of RAID
# Options to enable various other RAIDframe RAID types.
# options	RF_INCLUDE_EVENODD=1
# options	RF_INCLUDE_RAID5_RS=1
# options	RF_INCLUDE_PARITYLOGGING=1
# options	RF_INCLUDE_CHAINDECLUSTER=1
# options	RF_INCLUDE_INTERDECLUSTER=1
# options 	RF_INCLUDE_PARITY_DECLUSTERING=1
# options	RF_INCLUDE_PARITY_DECLUSTERING_DS=1
#pseudo-device	md		1	# memory disk device (ramdisk)
#pseudo-device	vnd		4	# disk-like interface to files
<snip>

But in our distribution of the 1.6.2, we do not have it.

http://netbsd.ouellet.biz/iso/config-162.html

Look here:

<snip>
# Disk/mass storage pseudo-devices
#pseudo-device	ccd		4	# concatenated disk devices
#pseudo-device	raid		8	# RAIDframe disk driver
#options 	RAID_AUTOCONFIG		# auto-configuration of RAID
# Options to enable various other RAIDframe RAID types.
# options	RF_INCLUDE_EVENODD=1
# options	RF_INCLUDE_RAID5_RS=1
# options	RF_INCLUDE_PARITYLOGGING=1
# options	RF_INCLUDE_CHAINDECLUSTER=1
# options	RF_INCLUDE_INTERDECLUSTER=1
# options 	RF_INCLUDE_PARITY_DECLUSTERING=1
# options	RF_INCLUDE_PARITY_DECLUSTERING_DS=1
#pseudo-device	md		1	# memory disk device (ramdisk)
pseudo-device	vnd		4	# disk-like interface to files
<snip>

With the result that for a new install, I get a few times this:

<snip>

 >>>>>Kernelized RAIDframe activated

scsibus0: waiting 2 seconds for devices to settle...

wd0 at atabus0 drive 0INTRF

panic: siop_intr: I shouldn't be there !

Stopped at      0x801b5808:     jr      ra

                 bdslot: nop

ddb>


So, I am looking into this, but I would appreciate some feedback to make 
this better.

I really don't think anyone will put RAIDframe on a Cobalt right?

We do love it, but even this box have limits. (:>

Let me know, but look like we will do a trim on the default kernel for 
the cobalt to make this reliable on each install.

Daniel