port-cobalt: Re: hardclock(9) for cobalt

Subject: Re: hardclock(9) for cobalt
To: None <tsutsui@ceres.dti.ne.jp>
From: KIYOHARA Takashi <kiyohara@kk.iij4u.or.jp>
List: port-cobalt
Date: 08/18/2004 04:03:47

From: KIYOHARA Takashi <kiyohara@kk.iij4u.or.jp>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 11:06:41 +0900 (JST)

> However, now, gt(4) is not very well. Should gt(4) also be corrected?

Is it better to all also write the configuration register of GT64111 ?
--
kiyohara