From: Laurens Vets <laurens@daemon.be>
Date: Tue, 04 May 2004 20:18:02 +0200

snip.

> >>If NetBSD had proper Firewire support, yes.
> > 
> > 
> > I use firewire. However, there are some problems.
> > # TLB miss, unknown packet, etc...
> > 
> > Moreover by -current (& 1.6.1), it will not work.

> So, it's not so stable?  Ok, what about USB2.0?  I really would like to 
> use NetBSD becuase I don't have any experience with it yet.

see, those thread.

  (Firewire)
    http://mail-index.netbsd.org/port-cobalt/2004/01/10/0001.html

    http://mail-index.netbsd.org/port-cobalt/2004/01/25/0000.html

    http://mail-index.netbsd.org/port-cobalt/2004/02/13/0000.html

  (USB 2.0)
    http://mail-index.netbsd.org/port-cobalt/2004/02/18/0001.html

    http://mail-index.netbsd.org/port-cobalt/2004/03/09/0004.html


I think that cobalt cannot use about i386.
# very slowly, & panic()

For example, if it is going to build kernel, it will panic().  X-<
It seems that however, it is OK if it becomes as it reads since it
does not panic() to 3:15 (daily).  :-)
--
kiyohara