> On Thursday 29 March 2001  9:19 pm, Mike Pumford wrote:
> > > Actually the patch needs updating before it can be applied to current. I
> > > have done the mods necessary and the updated patch is attached.
> >
> > Actually it wasn't but here it is.
> >
> 
> Ok I'll give it a try this weekend, check my etherm still works, and submit 
> it (unless there's any objections)
> 
> Is there any reason for the:
> #ifdef EH500
> that are sprinkled through the code?  Is that code untested?  Perhaps we 
> should start a list of the #ifdef's we've got sprinkled through the code?
>
Yes that is non-working code that hopefully will support the Etherlan 
500 16bit podules. I would just remove that before commiting the code. 
I normally remove it before generating the patches but I forgot this 
time. I can cook a new patch this evening without it.

Mike