Hi,

Jason Thorpe wrote:

> Well, your reply to my original message was CC'd to this list... if you
> didn't want this discussion to happen here, well... you probably shouldn't
> have done that :-)

That one was, but my one at longer length was :) Unfortunately I've now
ended up copying poor Jason Tribbeck in on this too, so he'll get the
flak as well---sorry Jason!

Thanks for the 'nice' message anyway, I feel a lot better now :)

> It isn't worth the time spent because of the existence of UVM.  If it
> had been a more critical problem, then time spent fixing it would be
> worth it, in all likelihood.

Agreed, no doubt. Which I guess is what I meant to say but it just
didn't come out like that :)

> I am aware of that.  However, you're also not in a position where your
> statements could easily be confused as official statements of the British
> government.  (We're ignoring the fact that any statement about a tax increase
> is almost always true :-)

:)

> Anyhow, I'm sorry if you are really this upset over my statements.

Sorry we've wasted so much of each other's time on this one. So we'll
still go for that Indian/beer in a couple of months? :-)

	Best regards,

	Neil

-- 
Neil A. Carson   Business development, Causality and Chalice Technology
Causality:       WWW: http://www.causality.com email: neil@causality.com
Chalice Tech:    WWW: http://www.chaltech.com  email: neil@chaltech.com
Office contact:  Tel/Fax: +44 (0)181 930 7408  Mobile: +44 (0)370 593183
SA110+1100, 21285/PCI, ARM, 3D, RTOSs, NetBSD, Image Processing, NC OSs