On Wed, 28 Nov 2001, Ben Harris wrote:

> On Wed, 28 Nov 2001, David Brownlee wrote:
>
> > > Then swap1 should do:
> > >
> > > swapctl -A -t blk
> > > swapctl -A -t noblk -q
> > >
> > > and swap2 would stay as-is.
> >
> > 	What about just 'swapctl -A -q' in swap1 - that would allow you to
> > 	have swap on blk filesystems that get mounted later and picked up
> > 	by swap2?
>
> "blk filesystems" are raw discs.  I'd be a little worried about ones that
> aren't available until swap2.  Nonetheless, I'm not sure that doing this
> would have many bad consequences.  It probably wants floating past
> tech-userlevel first, in any case.

	That could be anything not in $critical_filesystems_beforenet -
	say /usr/local or /home. I agree a wider review would be
	a good thing :)

	PS: Are you going to be able to make the midlands acorn show?

-- 
		David/absolute		-- www.netbsd.org: No hype required --