port-arm: Re: Shouldn't we compile kernels at least without StrongARM optimizations?

Subject: Re: Shouldn't we compile kernels at least without StrongARM optimizations?
To: None <Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com>
From: Ignatios Souvatzis <ignatios@theory.cs.uni-bonn.de>
List: port-arm
Date: 01/24/2003 12:38:41

--ghzN8eJ9Qlbqn3iT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 11:28:19AM +0000, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> I'm pretty certain that there is at=20
> least one bug somewhere in the compiler, which is revealed every time you=
=20
> try to run Xemacs, but since it doesn't cause a crash, and since debuggin=
g=20
> X libraries is so hard (and I've no idea where in the towering edifice th=
e=20
> problem lies) I haven't been able to track that one down.

Look at my PR 19276. No X involved.

Regards,
	-is

--ghzN8eJ9Qlbqn3iT
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.i

iQEVAgUBPjElvzCn4om+4LhpAQGFoAgAns19pLmwUCX0f1wAklJOcf4KfCs/npLM
Fodbr9iz6DslA8pGYpTITZw7O33P4iGbRx0EFLte5lxWKR/yi8r4hlaOfUEkudad
YDIpT1uEi0XJAfBr3VAARwSHDeZzsOIDuqmDH1ldOrYW2Z7q9TlizpORcBs8NMGm
eQaCh8amSmGLJPaKz3QX7VBB5FO3NA2G7DA5TlpAmTancv5GLilcKv7ftI2GX5ku
gQNv4Gy/yOUD6iriYIX7G2Hb6iTEoUhpvk2TOZ+C/tv5Y3qpXH34ffkEgsiAw9cv
xdXXfY+LnPOf5vM3NqrSkFjjKCDLUH3jhv13c04myLJTtP+VWrzODg==
=XQM2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--ghzN8eJ9Qlbqn3iT--