port-arm: Shouldn't we compile kernels at least without StrongARM optimizations?

Subject: Shouldn't we compile kernels at least without StrongARM optimizations?
To: None <port-arm@netbsd.org>
From: Ignatios Souvatzis <ignatios@theory.cs.uni-bonn.de>
List: port-arm
Date: 01/24/2003 11:29:11

--TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

as all of you know, StrongARM optimized 1.6 compiled kernels tend to random
hangs.

Shouldn't we compile kernels without archv4 and strongarm optimizations=20
until the compiler is fixed?

(I know the compiler has more problems - see for example PR 19276. But we
should at least make the kernel stable enough to _test_ the compiler.)

Regards,
	-is

--TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.i

iQEVAgUBPjEVZjCn4om+4LhpAQHVggf+Ogfx6TTVc9B9W4ztSptUzg4P1/bU3BpU
FQPT+bppqaVrsvUQe0OlF8j8HOPnBWCbZ/NVCcJj8PbOHRR7RmpXgtWi+sCtibAs
mgwqVM0egSntqxcM3nxjh7tfoBdy56dixclC3Ll+TEwvyLwRRmZttjW65rodp9v5
H/xJ/9KzLo4FcwWDkFiwLi0lU9pBr8+yMY+IxZuYQa+eYvwtRtojPno1+b78ESQ2
02NArtPccC93gPxT2BnFu/MS5Lak55UrXEfV8kZ825k11b72nU738nSizEJFikRJ
atnGqNPn3GsAjaUL602Tsa99iTRVgWZFQg/VNeEGD6hWhcjwQ0GsTg==
=tfQ3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/--