--vGgW1X5XWziG23Ko
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 08:06:11PM +0000, Steve Woodford wrote:
=20
> Well, what I'm proposing would not, technically, be stealing the L1 page
> tables. Think of it more as a form of TLB miss when we have to replace an
> L1 descriptor when faulting due to a domain mismatch.

But an entry in the victim L1 table wont be there any longer (and would have
to be recreated itself after a context switch back, if needed), right?

Regards,
	-is
--=20
seal your e-mail: http://www.gnupg.org/

--vGgW1X5XWziG23Ko
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQE+IylgPCRcZ/VMtk4RAnkGAJ9fDvpIpBxFI47W9GTQNe/3EQhE/gCaA21x
O6QUV6EzsGpuj+A4k3YR5Ck=
=AwdX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--vGgW1X5XWziG23Ko--