Subject: Re: sa11x0_com.c
To: None <port-arm@netbsd.org>
From: Ignatios Souvatzis <is@netbsd.org>
List: port-arm
Date: 12/07/2002 17:39:18
--pQhZXvAqiZgbeUkD
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello,
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 03:26:20PM -0800, Jason R Thorpe wrote:
> Well, considering that the UARTs are built-in to the companion chip,
> I'm kind of wondering why they're at a different address on the Jornada.
>=20
> ...is something using a virtual address when it should be using a
> physical address?
See port-hpcarm. rjs claims "yes" and that he has a fix for this locally,
but not universal yet.
Regards,
-is
--=20
seal your e-mail: http://www.gnupg.org/
--pQhZXvAqiZgbeUkD
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (NetBSD)
iD8DBQE98iQyPCRcZ/VMtk4RAq2GAJ9nxCNa3TpHw7txEXDqDl4Cj1luIwCeO07A
fPQB2Noc51jwq3/e5pLwQlw=
=Gtyw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--pQhZXvAqiZgbeUkD--