Subject: Re: Data format compatibility: old NetBSD/arm32, NetBSD/arm 26 vs. 32 bit
To: Ignatios Souvatzis <ignatios@theory.cs.uni-bonn.de>
From: Ignatios Souvatzis <ignatios@theory.cs.uni-bonn.de>
List: port-arm
Date: 10/29/2002 17:53:19
--HVCoas+krw6dou6l
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 04:10:21PM +0100, Ignatios Souvatzis wrote:
> Hi,
>=20
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 01:58:45PM +0000, Ben Harris wrote:
>=20
> > No, but the only change I'm aware of is that double-precision floating
> > point numbers are stored with native word-order rather than with
> > big-endian word order and native byte order within words.
>=20
> eek. I just noticed a NEEDMENDIAN keyword in the packages' conf/NETBSDARM=
32.*

which is harmless.... not related to middle endian format.

	-is

--HVCoas+krw6dou6l
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.i

iQEVAgUBPb68lTCn4om+4LhpAQGydgf/fzyLbCmejCvmdp2XqjJXXESzn9yUu1Tz
T7v0/alnrdq+LjWDpo871IsF0ZrsYdHz7TxsPgjBcNe0egPLBwAmr7ZopPpIIYGK
FGTn3VTrik08x5PoWaKs9KuuuGyDfZVaAw0STBmgKqRn/rThrlvkacbuPUHyeuzi
vwdYR6bdTdCvN0svAOQuCwKhGBA6Jmos5IfW/ecnzQifZ5049V/IR38qQhyou2ZR
dN/ujAz4WCAVx+7z2/+zKX7P08UoIDHRT00x3yljbEFZTBRLUUeTxKVHNSoGc2ib
FVkqNFS7Vbky3lzzAOeh16mJY40swGHw5Bd7QBcjBJBZ59eSfFlnDw==
=ivwr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--HVCoas+krw6dou6l--