> In article <200203261011.KAA28033@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com>,
> Richard Earnshaw <Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com> wrote:
> 
> >I have to say, that you appear to be presenting this as a fait accompli.  
> >Given that this has always been discussed openly on the list before, I 
> >can't help feeling that you've been somewhat underhand about this.
> 
> It is not a fait accompli. We need to a working elf userland though, because
> it makes a lot of things easier for release engineering. If that can be
> done with packed-enums, all the better.
> 
> christos

Er, if:


thorpej@wasabisystems.com said:
> This means not using packed-enums (I actually
> 	  backed out the packed-enum change to the compiler a few minutes
> 	  ago),

isn't a fait accompli, I'd like to know what is.

R.