Richard Earnshaw wrote:

> 
> Yes, fine by me, but I think we should also state that any SWI made
> *directly* from thumb code is handled "as if" it were done as SYS_syscall
> (except that the immediate field of the thumb swi instruction is not used).

I would suggest checking it for some value - just to 'future proof'
things.

I realise this means a counple of branches in the thumb swi case....

	David