Subject: Re: /usr/include/machine
To: Noriyuki Soda <soda@sra.co.jp>
From: Matt Thomas <matt@3am-software.com>
List: port-arm
Date: 07/12/2001 10:35:44
At 02:16 AM 7/13/2001 +0900, Noriyuki Soda wrote:
> >>>>> On Thu, 12 Jul 2001 10:15:32 -0700,
> Matt Thomas <matt@3am-software.com> said:
>
> >> If you are thinking about directory hierarchy which are shareable
> >> on same ${MACHINE_CPU}, you should use platform independent
> >> mailing list rather than port-arm for the discussion.
>
> > Depends. I'm not sure I agree.
>
> >> I think arm ports should revive /usr/include/machine, at least until
> >> consensus is made.
>
> > I disagree. arm is currently the test case and leaving it as is will
> > cause us to find the problems and address them.
>
>If everything worked fine, it was ok.
>But the change breaks "make build" on even arm port.
Not every. arm32 still works. Only the new ports are
currently broke,
>So, it should be backed out, at least until the problem is solved.
>Shouldn't it?
No.
--
Matt Thomas Internet: matt@3am-software.com
3am Software Foundry WWW URL: http://www.3am-software.com/bio/matt/
Cupertino, CA Disclaimer: I avow all knowledge of this message