Subject: Re: How to work around the machine includes...
To: Chris Gilbert <chris@paradox.demon.co.uk>
From: Ben Harris <bjh21@netbsd.org>
List: port-arm
Date: 06/23/2001 00:56:35
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Chris Gilbert wrote:
> I've just tried building an uptodate current system, but it's failing due to
> missing <machine/x.h> entries. eg sys/param.h includes machine/param.h
Erm, in the organisation that Matt's set up (and that you're using on
cats), I think that /usr/include/machine should be a symlink to
/usr/include/arm. "make includes" in sys/arch should do this:
#
# For true arm ports, we point machine at the architecure directory
# since all the user include are there and are common.
#
.if ${ARCHSUBDIR} == arm && ${MACHINE} != arm32 && ${MACHINE} != arm26
SYMLINKS= ${ARCHSUBDIR} /usr/include/machine
.else
SYMLINKS= ${MACHINE} /usr/include/machine
.endif
--
Ben Harris <bjh21@netbsd.org>
Portmaster, NetBSD/arm26 <URL:http://www.netbsd.org/Ports/arm26/>