Re: gobsd vs. new kernels (Was: Re: building userland without a new kernel)

To: port-amiga%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: gobsd vs. new kernels (Was: Re: building userland without a new kernel)
From: Gunther Nikl <gni%gecko.de@localhost>
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 09:47:52 +0200

On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 08:57:49PM +0200, Ignatios Souvatzis wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 08:24:02PM -0400, admin%datazap.net@localhost wrote:
> > Does, anyone know if I will be able to boot a 2.0 kernel with gobsd?
> 
> AFAIK no.

  If Michael van Elst gives me the permission, I could make an
  ELF-supporting GoBSD availaibe.

  Gunther

-- 
Linux is only free if your time has no value
 - Jamie Zawinski

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gobsd vs. new kernels (Was: Re: building userland without a new kernel)
  - From: admin%datazap.net@localhost
- Re: gobsd vs. new kernels (Was: Re: building userland without a new kernel)
  - From: Michael van Elst

References:
- building userland without a new kernel
  - From: admin%datazap.net@localhost
- gobsd vs. new kernels (Was: Re: building userland without a new kernel)
  - From: Ignatios Souvatzis

Prev by Date: Re: building userland without a new kernel
Next by Date: Re: gobsd vs. new kernels (Was: Re: building userland without a new kernel)
Previous by Thread: gobsd vs. new kernels (Was: Re: building userland without a new kernel)
Next by Thread: Re: gobsd vs. new kernels (Was: Re: building userland without a new kernel)
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index