Subject: 'su -l' EQ 'su -'
To: None <port-amiga@netbsd.org>
From: Georges Heinesch <ghmlist@ibm.net>
List: port-amiga
Date: 08/21/1998 17:40:00
Just out of interest ...
Saying 'su - user' is does the same as 'su -l user'. For some reason,
the 'l' is not necessary. However su(1) doesn't reveal anything about
this behaviour. Why is this?
--
Cu Georges Heinesch, Luxembourg
geohei@ibm.net - geohei@geocities.com
http://www.geocities.com/yosemite/2480
PGP 2.6.3i / 5.1i public key on request and on public servers
... niammi niammi in my Tammi ...