Re: NetBSD vs. OpenBSD

[David L Miller <dlm%u.washington.edu@localhost>]

I haven't checked OpenBSD lately, but the last time I did, the Amiga
port was straight from the NetBSD distribution.  It looked like most
of the changes were in the Sun/SPARC area.  This was several months
ago, so the situation may have changed... 

-- 
David L. Miller       /|\  Not everything that can be counted counts;
dlm%u.washington.edu@localhost < + > and not everything counts that can be 
                      \|/  counted.  -- A. Einstein

On Fri, 11 Oct 1996, Bjoern Labitzke wrote:

> Delivered-To: port-amiga-outgoing%NetBSD.ORG@localhost
> To: port-amiga%NetBSD.ORG@localhost
> Message-ID: <23516F49H000085D9H%hermit.kellis.berlinet.de@localhost>
> From: Bjoern Labitzke <HERMIT%kellis.berlinet.de@localhost>
> Subject: NetBSD vs. OpenBSD
> Date: Fri, 11 Oct 1996 00:17:45 +0200
> X-Mailer: The Answer V3.06.22 via [DOS/NCBMail V2.30 REL.:010996]
> X-Gateway: ZCONNECT zelator.berlinet.de [UNIX/Connect v0.74b4]
> X-Zc-Via: 19961010230000W+1%kellis.berlinet.de@localhost
> Sender: owner-port-amiga%NetBSD.ORG@localhost
> Precedence: list
> Delivered-To: port-amiga%NetBSD.ORG@localhost
> 
> 
> Hello there...
> 
> I want to get an UNIX running on my Amiga. At the moment I think NetBSD is
> the right choice. But I just read about some new operating system called
> OpenBSD. It claims to be "NetBSD plus more".
> 
> What do you say to OpenBSD? What would you prefer? NetBSD or OpenBSD? And
> why? What do you expect the Amiga-support to be for OpenBSD? (Perhaps
> someone knows OpenBSD a bit more closely and can tell about his experience
> with one or both of the systems).
> 
> Many thanks in advance...
> 
> Bye, Bjoern
> 
> --
> Bjoern Labitzke   | E-Mail: hermit%kellis.berlinet.de@localhost | PGP - 
> Encryption
> PGP-Key available |         hermit%cs.tu-berlin.de@localhost    |     - 
> Authentication
>