Port-amd64 archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Why NetBSD x86's bus_space_barrier does not use [sml]fence?

To: Taylor R Campbell <campbell+netbsd-tech-kern%mumble.net@localhost>
Subject: Re: Why NetBSD x86's bus_space_barrier does not use [sml]fence?
From: Andrew Doran <ad%netbsd.org@localhost>
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2019 19:05:37 +0000

On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 07:03:50PM +0000, Andrew Doran wrote:

> We're talking UC/WB mappings here though, so:

Meant to write UC/WC - I must be getting old.

References:
- Re: Why NetBSD x86's bus_space_barrier does not use [sml]fence?
  - From: Andrew Doran
- Re: Why NetBSD x86's bus_space_barrier does not use [sml]fence?
  - From: Taylor R Campbell
- Re: Why NetBSD x86's bus_space_barrier does not use [sml]fence?
  - From: Andrew Doran

Prev by Date: Re: Why NetBSD x86's bus_space_barrier does not use [sml]fence?
Next by Date: Re: Why NetBSD x86's bus_space_barrier does not use [sml]fence?
Previous by Thread: Re: Why NetBSD x86's bus_space_barrier does not use [sml]fence?
Next by Thread: Re: Why NetBSD x86's bus_space_barrier does not use [sml]fence?
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index