Re: Port specific man pages

[christos%zoulas.com@localhost (Christos Zoulas)]

On Dec 21,  2:03pm, chacon.james%gmail.com@localhost (James Chacon) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: Port specific man pages

| On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Christos Zoulas 
<christos%astron.com@localhost> wrot=
| e:
| > In article 
<CAA1X9Ueyg_2U=3DMOPjkqa4NwMK21ZWQXsNdO54hHje0AoWRqd0A%mail.gm@localhost=
| ail.com>,
| > James Chacon =A0<chacon.james%gmail.com@localhost> wrote:
| >>
| >>Basically the default search path doesn't work except for the direct
| >>mapping to $ARCH only. For i386/amd64 they really need to pickup x86
| >>by default also. I'll look at it tonight.
| >
| > When did you last update /etc/man.conf?
| >
| 
| I originally installed a 5.1 image on this box then did a -current
| build, unpacked it and did postinstall. So if that skipped man.conf
| updates there's a bug somewhere.
| 
| I see they are different when I look in src/etc so easy fix. Wonder
| why postinstall didn't catch this?

It does not know about man.conf, perhaps someone should teach it.

christos