--gKMricLos+KVdGMg
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Sep 22 2005 - 19:05, Hubert Feyrer wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Sep 2005, Joel CARNAT wrote:
> >>I guess fully working compat_netbsd32 would be needed. I have no idea h=
ow
> >you mean "would be needed" for 3.x or ASAP ?
>=20
> For executing 32bit binaries (e.g. from Linux/i386) on a 64bit system=20
> (e.g. NetBSD/amd64). Pick your timeframe. :)
>=20

hum... not sure how to understand this :)

I did run 2.0/i386 binaries on 3.99.8/amd64.
Plus, I think netbsd/sparc64 knows how to run netbsd/sparc and
solaris/sparc, doesn't it.

So, must I understand running Linux/i386 will be there soon (aka, easy
to do), or not ?


--gKMricLos+KVdGMg
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFDMvq/0/VH7L7F7Y4RAitrAJ9UlmOXCzaxG876VaYb0sHT8bxIQwCeKc+s
G4ommFFeVtLsN8w/A8rnWIQ=
=6UT5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--gKMricLos+KVdGMg--