thorpej@shagadelic.org wrote on source-changes:

> > On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 11:00:15PM +0000, Jason R Thorpe wrote:
> >>          uvm_swap.h uvm_vnode.c
> >>
> >> Replace the Mach-derived boolean_t type with the C99 bool type.  A
> >> future commit will replace use of TRUE and FALSE with true and false.
> >
> > This changes alignment of, for example, uvm.page_idle_zero and thereby
> > breaks sparc64. Should alignment (and size) be restored for those, or
> > the access fixed?
> 
> the access should be fixed.

Alpha seems to require the similar fix.
Is the attached diff okay?
(just taken from gcc -S output since I don't know alpha asm at all)
---
Izumi Tsutsui

Index: alpha/locore.s
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/src/sys/arch/alpha/alpha/locore.s,v
retrieving revision 1.109
diff -u -r1.109 locore.s
--- alpha/locore.s	9 Feb 2007 21:55:01 -0000	1.109
+++ alpha/locore.s	24 Feb 2007 10:28:16 -0000
@@ -696,7 +696,10 @@
 	ldl	t0, sched_whichqs		/* look for non-empty queue */
 	bne	t0, 4f
 2:	lda	t0, uvm
-	ldl	t0, UVM_PAGE_IDLE_ZERO(t0)	/* should we zero some pages? */
+	ldq_u	t1, UVM_PAGE_IDLE_ZERO(t0)
+	lda	t0, UVM_PAGE_IDLE_ZERO(t0)	/* should we zero some pages? */
+	extbl	t1, t0, t0
+	and	t0, 0xff, t0
 	beq	t0, 3f				/* nope. */
 	CALL(uvm_pageidlezero)
 3:	ldl	t0, sched_whichqs		/* look for non-empty queue */