Subject: Re: Mystical isacfg incantation for DE205?
To: Matt Thomas <matt@3am-software.com>
From: Kevin P. Neal <kpneal@pobox.com>
List: port-alpha
Date: 03/22/2001 21:48:19
On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 09:35:00PM -0800, Matt Thomas wrote:
> At 12:15 AM 3/22/2001 -0500, Kevin P. Neal wrote:
> >Ok, so I have my AXPpci33 here and it actually runs. Good. Now I want
> >to add a de205 to it (in addition to the PCI ethernet and wide scsi
> >boards I have).
> 
> Try add_de205 at the SRM prompt.  There should be a built-in script to
> do it.

Right, it didn't work then.
 
> >If I really want to save keystrokes I can fail exactly the same way with
> >"add_de205".
> 
> Try doing isacfg -init first and then add_de205.

*ding*

I ripped my ISA VGA card out and threw in the PCI VGA card from this other
wreck on my table (a PC). Fired up the AXPpci33. Then I did:
>>> isacfg -init,
>>> init (watch reboot)
>>> add_de205
>>> init (watch reboot)

Poof. When it came up it recognized the card as (I think) ena0. Is
dva0 the floppy drive? Because I don't think my SMC ethernet card shows 
up in SRM (not like I care, my PCI SMC card cost, "like", $5 new about
three years ago). The de205 shows up fine.

When I threw my PCI wide SCSI back in I was shocked to discover that
after all of this messing the SRM recognized the card. Yep, my wide
SCSI card is pkb0. Hot dog!

Thanks for the help.

> >(Come to think of it, should I isacfg the VGA card as well?)
> >
> >Incidentally, is there some documentation at the big Q site on isacfg
> >in the SRM? I'm coming up a little short here on what all of those
> >options mean.
> 
> What's your current isacfg (e.g what's the output of >>> show config)?

You know, I'd give you that if I could get the serial ports on this
thing working. I thought I had it, but no ..... Oh, and I figured out
how to get into my "new" terminal server ... except I don't know the
password ....

At least I have enough paint to finish the case. 
-- 
Kevin P. Neal                                http://www.pobox.com/~kpn/

"Nonbelievers found it difficult to defend their position in \ 
    the presense of a working computer." -- a DEC Jensen paper