Subject: Re: why is there no libgcc.so
To: Jason R Thorpe <thorpej@zembu.com>
From: Todd Vierling <tv@wasabisystems.com>
List: port-alpha
Date: 03/08/2001 09:51:01
On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Jason R Thorpe wrote:

:  > Various reasons, mostly historic, and this will be fixed in the next major
:  > release of NetBSD (...which will also have a gcc updated to the 2.95.x
:  > series).
:
: Has the shared libgcc thing been discussed on tech-toolchain?  It seems
: like a terrible mistake to me.  libgcc is really part of the compiler.
: We should probably provide a PIC version, but I would say not a shared
: version.

I actually meant to clarify that.  I plan to have libgcc.a and libgcc_pic.a,
the latter of which will be linked into shared objects on "cc -shared".
(Currently, libgcc isn't involved on "cc -shared", which makes use of
libgcc2 functions in dlopen()ed objects complicated.)

-- 
-- Todd Vierling <tv@wasabisystems.com>  *  Wasabi NetBSD:  Run with it.
-- NetBSD 1.5 now available on CD-ROM  --  http://www.wasabisystems.com/