Subject: Re: RAIDFrame or CCD? (WAS Re: ccd0c weirdness)
To: None <port-alpha@netbsd.org>
From: der Mouse <mouse@Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA>
List: port-alpha
Date: 03/09/2000 00:40:50
> ccd and raidframe are both perfectly reasonable and stable for
> striping. But that's all ccd does (well, it also concatenates, which
> raidframe *doesn't* do, but no one really uses that feature all that
> much :-)
Eh? That's all I ever *have* done with ccd. Surely I'm not all *that*
unusual. (The time ccd was most useful to me was probably when I had
to deal with a disc with a bunch of hard errors, in the interim before
a replacement was available. I defined a bunch of partitions, leaving
the errors in the holes between partitions, and used a ccd to weld the
fragments together into a functional disk.)
der Mouse
mouse@rodents.montreal.qc.ca
7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B