Subject: RAIDFrame or CCD? (WAS Re: ccd0c weirdness)
To: enami tsugutomo <enami@sm.sony.co.jp>
From: Mocha <netbsd_alpha@yahoo.com>
List: port-alpha
Date: 03/08/2000 21:52:49
While we are on the topic of CCD, which is performs better and more 
stabble? ccd or raidframe?

At 12:40 PM 3/9/00 +0900, enami tsugutomo wrote:
>seebs@plethora.net (Peter Seebach) writes:
>
> > >``The kernel will only allow component partitions of type FS_BSDFFS.''
> >
> > Weird.  I'm using 'unknown' and it works.
>
>Note that currently who is rejecting the partition of type unused is
>each component's open routine not ccd driver itself.
>
># Hmm, so, `kernel will ...' but currently doesn't.
>enami.