Subject: Re: is NAT broken in 1.3?
To: nm <email@example.com>
From: Curt Sampson <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 02/24/1998 09:02:26
I've seen some problems with NAT too, though I thought it was to
do with a bizarre routing situation, and haven't had time to
investigate further. If anyone wants to look into this in a little
more detail, I'd appreciate it.
Curt Sampson email@example.com Info at http://www.portal.ca/
Internet Portal Services, Inc. Through infinite mist, software reverberates
Vancouver, BC (604) 257-9400 In code possess'd of invisible folly.
On Tue, 24 Feb 1998, nm wrote:
> X-Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Date: Tue, 24 Feb 1998 00:18:26 -0500
> To: port-alpha@NetBSD.ORG
> From: nm <email@example.com>
> Subject: is NAT broken in 1.3?
> does nat work in 1.3 on alpha?
> it seems that icmp works right but udp and tcp dont appear
> to flow...
> is the a known problem?
> nick maniscalco