Subject: Re: LITERALSLEAZY .lita
To: Chris G Demetriou <Chris_G_Demetriou@ux2.sp.cs.cmu.edu>
From: John Birrell <jb@cimlogic.com.au>
List: port-alpha
Date: 10/19/1996 14:11:10
> > When linking a big program [with ld -v = 2.5-95q4 (with BFD 2.5-95q4)],
> > I get:
> >
> > /u/dev/netbsd/libc/sleep.c:39: relocation truncated to fit: LITERALSLEAZY .lita
> >
> > Can anyone tell me what this means?
>
> You have too much data living off the GP. Basically, it (and the
> hundreds of similar messages you probably also saw 8-) is an annoying
> way of saying "don't do that."
>
> The LITERALSLEAZY relocation is my hack to extend the amount of data
> that can be addressed relative to the GP by the LITERAL relocation by
> 4x. (LITERAL can address 64k of data relative to the GP,
> LITERALSLEAZY can address 256k, or should be able to.)
>
> I noticed problems with LITERAL when linking large programs (e.g. some
> gcc modules, or the kernel). I've never seen the LITERALSLEAZY-hacked
> toolchain run out of GP space. *sigh*
Arrrgh! So much for building a massively threaded application. So
much for a you-beaut-64-bit-processor. All that address space, but
only 64k rungs in the ladder to get you there.
I already ran up against this with DEC's OSF/1 linker when I tried
to link just part of this same software for VxWorks/Alpha (which
*must* be linked as a single program). DEC's response was "tough".
There turned out to be a work around in that case - VxWorks can
dynamically load modules and their module handling doesn't suffer
from the same limitation.
>
> moving to ELF helps this slightly, but there's still a limit in the
> hopefully, that'll be fixed.
Hmm. When will your ELF stuff be available? I feel the need to hack...
Will shared libraries under ELF help me?
>
>
>
> chris
>
Regards,
--
John Birrell CIMlogic Pty Ltd
jb@cimlogic.com.au 119 Cecil Street
Ph +61 3 9690 6900 South Melbourne Vic 3205
Fax +61 3 9690 6650 Australia
Mob +61 18 353 137