pkgsrc-WIP-review archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Please review wip/gcc47
Hi,
> IMO, we need py-gcc47 for those files.
We could make the installation a non-default option instead. I will take
a look at how to get rid of python. Besides the stupid bloat caused by
it, we might even get in to a chicken and egg situation on some systems
where python needs a newer gcc to build, which cannot be built without
python.
Building a separate py-gcc47 package with just the python files and the
shell scripts using them could cause a lot of maintainance problems. But
I will look for a solution.
Regards,
Kai-Uwe
--
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10 Tips for Better Web Security
Learn 10 ways to better secure your business today. Topics covered include:
Web security, SSL, hacker attacks & Denial of Service (DoS), private keys,
security Microsoft Exchange, secure Instant Messaging, and much more.
http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51426210/
_______________________________________________
pkgsrc-wip-review mailing list
pkgsrc-wip-review%lists.sourceforge.net@localhost
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pkgsrc-wip-review
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index