Re: please review baler and eor

[Thomas Klausner <thomasklausner%users.sourceforge.net@localhost>]

On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 05:34:38PM +0200, Jan Šmydke wrote:
> Thank you for your comments - all fixed. I hope the DESTDIR support
> in eor now works as you expected.

I had to add
INSTALLATION_DIRS=     bin
because otherwise the bin directory wasn't created. Now it works.

> par2 is very good, yet too sophisticated and seemed not to be
> maintained more(?). EOR, by contrast, brings simplicity so that even if
> EOR is no longer mantained, a user does not have to worry about his
> data, because anyone can write EOR easily again :-)
> 
> Similar idea brought Baler (vs too sophisticated dar & comp ...)

I've fixed baler as well, for the /usr/bin/env issue (in pkgsrc we
want the interpreters hardcoded to the one used as dependency, not run
through the environment looking for perhaps another one).

I think the packages are finished, but I'll leave it to someone else
to import them to pkgsrc since I think better tools exist there
already -- I hope that doesn't offend you :)
 Thomas

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Achieve unprecedented app performance and reliability
What every C/C++ and Fortran developer should know.
Learn how Intel has extended the reach of its next-generation tools
to help boost performance applications - inlcuding clusters.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay
_______________________________________________
pkgsrc-wip-review mailing list
pkgsrc-wip-review%lists.sourceforge.net@localhost
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pkgsrc-wip-review