pkgsrc-WIP-review archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: wip/dcc -> pkgsrc?
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 10:30:09AM -0500, Greg Troxel wrote:
>
> In MESSAGE, I would drop the license bit, unless upstream has asked for
> it. Perhaps change to just "Running dcc will query servers which have
> Terms of Use; see the license", because the code license part is no
> different than many other bits of non-free software.
Even though I've never asked upstream, I'd like to keep that part. It's
not that much about the software than it's about people selling manpower
of others (all the work needed in order to keep the public DCC network
in shape). Upstream really dislikes that behaviour and since people
sometimes just install stuff without ever reading LICENSE, it makes
sense to point that out---as clearly, as upstream does on the dcc
mailing list over and over again.. :)
> I don't understand about the passowrd/unique-id and if 'make install' in
> pkgsrc generates those.
You mean INSTALL? I'm just reproducing the steps from the official
Makefile since we never run `make install' there. Without that part,
the default installation will create configuration files with default
(unsafe) secrets: `secret1' and `secret2'.
Petar Bogdanovic
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support
A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy
Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
pkgsrc-wip-review mailing list
pkgsrc-wip-review%lists.sourceforge.net@localhost
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pkgsrc-wip-review
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index