Fulvio Ciriaco wrote: > At Fri, 16 Jan 2009 17:26:19 +0100, > Adam Hoka wrote: > > > > I made some changes locally, I will commit them after testing. > > The makfile looked quite good the only problem was the > > overusing of USE_TOOLS, you only need to use it once. > > > I saw your fixes. I am still quite new at pkgsrc. > Did you have the opportunity to test it on other platforms? > Fulvio It was a very nice for a first package, the only problem was your unfamiliarity with our conventions. I think there's very much work to with the package to be importable. Maybe you could start looking at comments beginning with XXX? :-) And an other idea: maybe you could use pax to install the files, just add pax to USE_TOOLS and use pax -rw (more reliable than plain cp). On the testing side, I have only tried on 5.0 but it worked very well. -- When in doubt, use brute force. Adam Hoka <ahoka%NetBSD.org@localhost> Adam Hoka <ahoka%MirBSD.de@localhost> Adam Hoka <adam.hoka%gmail.com@localhost>
Attachment:
pgp9vZdp4N63i.pgp
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
_______________________________________________ pkgsrc-wip-review mailing list pkgsrc-wip-review%lists.sourceforge.net@localhost https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pkgsrc-wip-review