Re: missing license?

[Aleksej Saushev <asau%inbox.ru@localhost>]

Fredrik Pettai <pettai%nordu.net@localhost> writes:

> On 11/10/09 11:06 PM, Larson, Timothy E. wrote:
>>> How does it differ from new BSD?
>>
>> I guess the terms are substantially the same as the 3-clause version, except 
>> that the copyright isn't to UCBerkeley, etc etc.
>
> You can use this in the Makefile, which I do for missing licenses
>
> LICENSE=        xxx-license
> LICENSE_FILE=   ${FILESDIR}/xxx-license
>
> (and add the licens to the files directory for that package)

Common opinion is using "modified-bsd" for all BSD licences where terms
are equivalent and only copyright holder differs.


-- 
HE CE3OH...

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
pkgsrc-wip-discuss mailing list
pkgsrc-wip-discuss%lists.sourceforge.net@localhost
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pkgsrc-wip-discuss