Bartosz Ku=C5=BAma wrote:
Roland Illig wrote: =20Log Message: BUILDLINK_API_DEPENDS replaced with BUILDLINK_DEPENDS.Why did you do that? To my knowledge BUILDLINK_DEPENDS has been deprecated in late March of this year, and has been replaced with BUILDLINK_API_DEPENDS.=20 =20 I was confused about building process wip/granule under pkgsrc-2006Q1 when BUILDLINK_API_DEPENDS is set instead of BUILDLINK_DEPENDS (I mean that under pkgsrc-2006Q1 it no build at all). After I'd received your email I found CVS commit message with changes BUILDLINK_DEPENDS -> BUILDLINK_API_DEPENDS, and I noticed that this changes has made after pkgsrc-2006Q1 has been branched. It seems that I should replace it agai=
n. Thanks for the explanation. In my opinion it should be possible to use=20 pkgsrc-wip together with the latest stable branch of pkgsrc. I've=20 forwarded the issue to tech-pkg. Roland ------------------------------------------------------- All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and Risk! Fully trained technicians. The highest number of Red Hat certifications in the hosting industry. Fanatical Support. Click to learn more http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=107521&bid=248729&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ pkgsrc-wip-discuss mailing list pkgsrc-wip-discuss%lists.sourceforge.net@localhost https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pkgsrc-wip-discuss