pkgsrc-WIP-discuss archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: twisted2 doc packages
- To: Siegmund Fuehringer <sifu%0xx0.net@localhost>
- Subject: Re: twisted2 doc packages
- From: Thomas Klausner <thomasklausner%users.sourceforge.net@localhost>
- Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 15:03:00 +0200 See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. Report problems to http://sf.net/tracker/?func=add&group_id=1&atid=200001 0.0 SF_CHICKENPOX_PERIOD BODY: Text interparsed with . 0.0 SF_CHICKENPOX_SLASH BODY: Text interparsed with / 0.0 SF_CHICKENPOX_MINUS BODY: Text interparsed with - 0.0 SF_CHICKENPOX_UNDERSCORE BODY: Text interparsed with _ 0.0 SF_CHICKENPOX_EQUAL BODY: Text interparsed with = 0.0 SF_CHICKENPOX_AT BODY: Text interparsed with @ -0.3 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 09:36:53AM +0800, Siegmund Fuehringer wrote:
> with version 2 of twisted the subprojects are released in seperate
> distfiles. almost all of them also containing documentation.
> should i create seperate -docs packages for them (like with the current
> py-twisted package), or should i place the docs in the project package?
Usually we do not create separate packages if the authors do
not split them.
One reason why we sometimes do it is that the documentation would
introduce some big or annoying dependency. Is this the case here?
Thomas
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
pkgsrc-wip-discuss mailing list
pkgsrc-wip-discuss%lists.sourceforge.net@localhost
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pkgsrc-wip-discuss
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index