pkgsrc-Users archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: lang/quickjs - I have a patch that fixes on port-sparc - proper steps to address ?

To: vom513 <vom513%gmail.com@localhost>
Subject: Re: lang/quickjs - I have a patch that fixes on port-sparc - proper steps to address ?
From: Thomas Klausner <wiz%gatalith.at@localhost>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2026 18:07:16 +0200

On Thu, Aug 13, 2026 at 10:34:46AM +0100, vom513 wrote:
> Should I file a PR to NetBSD ?  Open an upstream bug and reference that PR ?  Both ?  Something else ?  Want to do this “the right way” on the first shot.

Since quickjs seems to still be in active development, IMHO the best
way is both: file an upstream bug report, and then we can pull that in
as a patch for pkgsrc.

Thanks,
 Thomas

Follow-Ups:
- Re: lang/quickjs - I have a patch that fixes on port-sparc - proper steps to address ?
  - From: vom513

References:
- lang/quickjs - I have a patch that fixes on port-sparc - proper steps to address ?
  - From: vom513

Prev by Date: Re: Review request: update www/privoxy to 4.2.0
Next by Date: Re: lang/quickjs - I have a patch that fixes on port-sparc - proper steps to address ?
Previous by Thread: lang/quickjs - I have a patch that fixes on port-sparc - proper steps to address ?
Next by Thread: Re: lang/quickjs - I have a patch that fixes on port-sparc - proper steps to address ?
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index