On Monday, 30 September 2024 14.36.41 CEST Greg Troxel wrote:
> Mads Rasmussen <madsrasmussen%aserv.dk@localhost> writes:
>
> [openssl building woes]
>
> You didn't specify:
>
> - which OS, version, cpu, are you building on
> - how did you bootstrap pkgsrc, or are you using the native NetBSD
> - did you remove all workdirs before you started
> - which version of pkgsrc, and did you ensure that all installed
> packages are from that version
> - do you have anything in mk.conf, and if so, what happened when you
> - removed it
> - did you 'make test', or just 'make package'
>
> > ${LDCMD:-cc} -pthread -Wa,--noexecstack -O2 -O3 -pipe -I/usr/include
> > -I/usr/ pkg/include -L/usr/local/lib
> > -L/usr/pkg/gcc7/lib/gcc/x86_64--netbsd/7.5.0 -
> > Wl,-R/usr/pkg/gcc7/lib/gcc/x86_64--netbsd/7.5.0 -Wl,-zrelro -L/usr/lib
> > -Wl,-R/ usr/lib -L/usr/pkg/lib -Wl,-R/usr/pkg/lib \
> >
> > -o fuzz/quic-srtm-test \
> > fuzz/quic-srtm-test-bin-fuzz_rand.o \
> > fuzz/quic-srtm-test-bin-quic-srtm.o \
> > fuzz/quic-srtm-test-bin-test-corpus.o \
> > libssl.a libcrypto.a -pthread
>
> 1) I am not familiar with the details, but it looks like a bug to have
> /usr/include before /usr/pkg/include, and to have /usr/local at all.
>
> 2) When building, a package should use its own includes from the source
> tree ahead of anything from the system. Even for tests. This may be
> due to something you are doing, a bug in upstream openssl, a bug in
> pkgsrc, or something else.
>
> 3) This is using gcc7, which doesn't make sense because NetBSD 9 has
> gcc7, and NetBSD 8 and earlier are obsolete.
>
> > I have no /usr/local/lib (I think this is a Linux concept?) and I am
> > pretty
>
> I am 99% sure it's from BSD from before there was Linux. It's for
> things that are built for that machine only, and thus packaging systems
> should not use it, and it is almost always empty in modern times.
>
> > sure its the L/usr/lib part that makes it fail, and I may be wrong here,
> > but would the standard Makefile from pkgsrc/security/openssl not replace
> > the system supplied version of OpenSSL? There are multiple warnings about
> > this in the OpenSSL documentation, so I can't imagine I am right about
> > this, but -- libdir=lib would place libcrypto.so and libssl.so in
> > /usr/lib?
>
> pkgsrc openssl should build to /usr/pkg (or however bootstrapped). When
> building, it should use its own headers before anything.
>
> I just did 'make package' for security/openssl on NetBSD 10 amd64 with
> pkgsrc HEAD (10 has 3.0.12 in base). It built fine, and make test
> also ran for a while and got hung up on
>
> 04-test_bio_dgram.t .....................
>
> which may or may not be related to what you are seeing.
>
> I then did 'make' on netbsd-9 amd64 2024Q2. 9 has 1.1.1t in base.
> That succeeded also.
I am on NetBSD 8.3 amd64, I am using the native NetBSD pkgsrc, current, and
yes, no work dirs and "make clean" before each build, I initially had nothing
in mk.conf, I have been trying all sorts of things to resolve this, including
a lot of different settings in my mk.conf, but I don't think its the settings
in mk.conf, since the issue was there before I did anything to mk.conf.
I am following the pkgsrc guide, just issuing "make" in the usr/pkgsrc/
security/openssl directory, and I have been updating my pkgsrc repository
periodically with CVS
I don't have a /usr/local/lib directory on the system, I guess /usr/local/lib
could have been used historically on some flavor of BSD in the past, but its
definitely also a Linux thing now: https://refspecs.linuxfoundation.org/
FHS_3.0/fhs/ch04s09.html
NetBSD 8.3 came with GCC 4, I was able to build GCC 7 from pkgsrc.
I just tried with "make package" exact same issueAttachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.