Re: Wine/DosBox (in)security settings

To: Dan-Simon Myrland <dansimon%radiotube.org@localhost>, nia <nia%netbsd.org@localhost>
Subject: Re: Wine/DosBox (in)security settings
From: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%bec.de@localhost>
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2024 15:56:22 +0200

On Wednesday, April 3, 2024 1:17:05 PM CEST nia wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 01, 2024 at 04:17:55PM +0200, Dan-Simon Myrland wrote:
> > security.pax.mprotect.enabled=0
> > security.pax.aslr.enabled=0
> 
> I am worried that this is because of the behaviour of libGL.
> This should not be necessary.

It makes perfect sense for dosbox to require both. I also wouldn't be
surprised if Windows software at least fails with mprotect hardening.

Joerg

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Wine/DosBox (in)security settings
  - From: nia

References:
- Wine/DosBox (in)security settings
  - From: Dan-Simon Myrland
- Re: Wine/DosBox (in)security settings
  - From: nia

Prev by Date: Re: Wine/DosBox (in)security settings
Next by Date: Re: Wine/DosBox (in)security settings
Previous by Thread: Re: Wine/DosBox (in)security settings
Next by Thread: Re: Wine/DosBox (in)security settings
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index