Mayuresh <mayuresh%acm.org@localhost> writes: > I noticed wip/antlr. Is it still wip or ripe enough to be considered for > pkgsrc? I looked at it for 30s and it is obviously not ready: There's a lot of commented out code in the Makefile There is a non-empty TODO pkglint has a warning So if you care about it you are welcome to work on it. > antlr 2.x is still widely used and will be nice to have in pkgsrc. I'd > request for it to be in pkgsrc. The DESCR of wip/antlr does not have a second paragraph explaining if it is old but maintained, old and unmaintained, or ? From a 2-minute look of the situation in pkgsr and wip, I do not understand the antlr world at all.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature