[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: procfs difference between NetBSD and Linux
On Mon, 21 Jun 2021 at 11:24, nia <nia%netbsd.org@localhost> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 08:19:53PM +0100, David Brownlee wrote:
> > On Wed, 2 Jun 2021 at 23:05, Mark Davies <mark%ecs.vuw.ac.nz@localhost> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 2/06/21 8:32 am, Chavdar Ivanov wrote:
> > > > I force-downgraded samba 4.14.4 to 4.13.9 (itself released recently,
> > > > 11th of May). It works as expected.
> > > > The cvs diff with respect to the current pkgsrc version is attached,
> > > > in case someone else hits the same problem. Surely the other packages
> > > > using samba should be also rebuilt - and database/ldb uninstalled, as
> > > > it conflicts with samba 4.13.9.
> > > >
> > > > I basically just changed the package version in the Makefile, removing
> > > > references to database/ldb; edited the distinfo file and ran 'make
> > > > distinfo'. The PLIST was also manually adjusted.
> > >
> > > Yeah, locally I reverted to 4.13.7 which was the last 4.13 version in
> > > pkgsrc. Just added an additional patch to make it happy to use the
> > > latest ldb, but if we are actually reverting samba in pkgsrc we should
> > > probably revert ldb as well.
> > Maybe add 4.13.7 plus your patch to pkgsrc-wip, so anyone using samba4
> > from pkgsrc current on netbsd-9 has an easy way to get a working
> > system pending the kernel pullup?
> > David
> This really isn't good enough, we're about to do a stable release
> of pkgsrc with broken samba. Samba should be fixed before we cut
> the release, we can't tell people not to use binary packages because
> they're broken.
A little above Martin says pullups for the systems are in progress. I
guess this should be coordinated.
The alternative would be to downgrade to samba 4.13.9. I don't know
what is better, it is all a matter of timing.
Main Index |
Thread Index |