Re: TeX without ghostscript

To: pkgsrc-users%NetBSD.org@localhost
Subject: Re: TeX without ghostscript
From: David Holland <dholland-pkgusers%netbsd.org@localhost>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 04:02:10 +0000

On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 08:32:07PM +0100, Robert Swindells wrote:
 > Is it possible to build print/tex-latex without ghostscript of some
 > kind ?

For useful tex installs in general probably not; for tex-latex in
particular though I don't see it in the dependency graph. Does it turn
up as a build dep?

It would be nice to disentangle postscript from tex but it's not going
to be easy and probably needs to be pursued upstream first.

-- 
David A. Holland
dholland%netbsd.org@localhost

References:
- TeX without ghostscript
  - From: Robert Swindells

Prev by Date: Re: Off-list reply taken back on-list involving check-file-prefix crud and pkg_add not replacing by default.
Next by Date: Re: Off-list reply taken back on-list involving check-file-prefix crud and pkg_add not replacing by default.
Previous by Thread: TeX without ghostscript
Next by Thread: pkg_rolling-replace 'make clean' fails for "security/gpgme"
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index