Re: mail/neomutt and mail/mutt don't need to CONFLICT?

To: Michael-John Turner <mj%mjturner.net@localhost>, pkgsrc-users <pkgsrc-users%netbsd.org@localhost>
Subject: Re: mail/neomutt and mail/mutt don't need to CONFLICT?
From: Thomas Klausner <tk%giga.or.at@localhost>
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2020 18:43:33 +0200

On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 03:01:32PM +0100, Jonathan Perkin wrote:
> On a related note, is it normal that neomutt is pretty terrible?  I
> got hangs and display corruption when trying it on macOS.  I went
> pretty quickly back to my trusty mutt.

I didn't see display corruption. I think the late 2019 releases were
relatively bad (I saw a couple bugs there), but the 2020 ones are
better again.
 Thomas

References:
- mail/neomutt and mail/mutt don't need to CONFLICT?
  - From: Michael-John Turner
- Re: mail/neomutt and mail/mutt don't need to CONFLICT?
  - From: Jonathan Perkin

Prev by Date: Re: mail/neomutt and mail/mutt don't need to CONFLICT?
Next by Date: Re: devel/SDL2 on Mac OS X 10.15.x (Darwin 19.4.x)
Previous by Thread: Re: mail/neomutt and mail/mutt don't need to CONFLICT?
Next by Thread: devel/snappy fails to compile (needed for qemu)
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index