pkgsrc-Users archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: no emacs/X binary packages considered bad, and worse than emacs with svg

To: Greg Troxel <gdt%lexort.com@localhost>
Subject: Re: no emacs/X binary packages considered bad, and worse than emacs with svg
From: "J. Lewis Muir" <jlmuir%imca-cat.org@localhost>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 15:06:17 -0500

On 08/29, Greg Troxel wrote:
> Note that this whole discussion can be terminated if someone actually
> fixes librsvg building on pkgbuild.

What's pkgbuild?  Is it pkgbuild.NetBSD.org from the following?

  https://wiki.netbsd.org/users/spz/admin/

Regards,

Lewis

References:
- no emacs/X binary packages considered bad, and worse than emacs with svg
  - From: Greg Troxel

Prev by Date: no emacs/X binary packages considered bad, and worse than emacs with svg
Next by Date: Re: no emacs/X binary packages considered bad, and worse than emacs with svg
Previous by Thread: no emacs/X binary packages considered bad, and worse than emacs with svg
Next by Thread: Re: no emacs/X binary packages considered bad, and worse than emacs with svg
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index