Re: x11/xlockmore - anyone using it?

[Paul Goyette <paul%whooppee.com@localhost>]

On Mon, 20 Mar 2017, Paul Goyette wrote:

> I've noticed for a while that xlockmore doesn't seem to be working.  It used 
> to work just fine, at least with my favorite, -mode maze, but now it seems to 
> fail regardless of what mode you specify.  It simply prints a one-word 
> message
>
> 	Abort
>
> without dropping core or any further debug info.
>
> Is anyone else using this package?  On amd64 port?

OK, it wasn't dropping a core file because the program runs 'setuid'!

Running xlock as root gives me a core dump, with the following traceback 
info:

(gdb) target core xlock.core
[New process 1]
Core was generated by `xlock'.
Program terminated with signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
#0  0x000070725283dd7a in _sys___sigprocmask14 () from /usr/lib/libc.so.12
(gdb) bt
#0  0x000070725283dd7a in _sys___sigprocmask14 () from /usr/lib/libc.so.12
#1  0x000070724e0094fb in pthread_sigmask () from /usr/lib/libpthread.so.1
#2  0x000070724e7c643e in radeon_drm_winsys_create () from /usr/X11R7/lib/modules/dri/r600_dri.so
#3  0x000070724e4ba1ac in dd_create_screen () from /usr/X11R7/lib/modules/dri/r600_dri.so
#4  0x000070724e4bbbee in ?? () from /usr/X11R7/lib/modules/dri/r600_dri.so
#5  0x000070724e4c4f01 in ?? () from /usr/X11R7/lib/modules/dri/r600_dri.so
#6  0x0000707254858f6c in ?? () from /usr/X11R7/lib/libGL.so.2
#7  0x0000707254851263 in __glXInitialize () from /usr/X11R7/lib/libGL.so.2
#8  0x00007072548533df in ?? () from /usr/X11R7/lib/libGL.so.2
#9  0x000070725485350d in glXChooseVisual () from /usr/X11R7/lib/libGL.so.2
.
.
.
.


Anyone got any clues?



+------------------+--------------------------+------------------------+
| Paul Goyette     | PGP Key fingerprint:     | E-mail addresses:      |
| (Retired)        | FA29 0E3B 35AF E8AE 6651 | paul at whooppee.com   |
| Kernel Developer | 0786 F758 55DE 53BA 7731 | pgoyette at netbsd.org |
+------------------+--------------------------+------------------------+