Re: gem'izing ruby-gnome2-*?

[Thomas Klausner <wiz%NetBSD.org@localhost>]

On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 10:53:20PM +0900, Izumi Tsutsui wrote:
> According to pkgsrc guide, it looks we should also bump PKGREVISIONs
> because at least PLISTs and (some) dependencies are updated:
> 
>  https://www.netbsd.org/docs/pkgsrc/fixes.html#bumping-pkgrevision
> >> PKGREVISION should be incremented for any non-trivial change
> >> in the resulting binary package. 
>  :
> >> Examples of changes that do not merit increasing PKGREVISION are:
> >>  - Changing HOMEPAGE, MAINTAINER, OWNER, or comments in Makefile.
> >>  - Changing build variables if the resulting binary package is the same.
> >>  - Changing DESCR.
> >>  - Adding PKG_OPTIONS if the default options don't change.
> >> Examples of changes that do merit an increase to PKGREVISION include:
> >>  - Security fixes
> >>  - Changes or additions to a patch file
> >>  - Changes to the PLIST
> >>  - A dependency is changed or renamed.
> ---
> 
> How should we handle the "merit" in this case?

Yes, PKGREVISION bump is necessary because the PLIST has changed.
 Thomas