Re: librsync

[Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>]

On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 07:16:18PM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
> What's the plan?   If there's a reason to have the older one, it shoudl
> have a  suffix so this is clear, vs a confusingly-different prefix.
> (net seems just as well; devel is an odd category)

I missed it when adding net/librsync and haven't gotten around to kill
devel/librsync due to the freeze. The former should work for everything
in pkgsrc.

Joerg